07-10-2011, 09:42 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1310289093' post='9886']
Yes, understood. I fixed it to some degree. I wanted to reduce the scale anyway because 2750 LW/PH were only achieved by the Pana 20 and the other lenses stood quite short of that. I was thinking of a [900, 2650] scale rather than [1000,2750]. It's now at [990,2640] - this is a bit odd, I know. However, the javascript engine is not that flexible at this stage (it takes 330 LW/PH steps from zero if you look deeper here but this is somewhat orbitary).
[/quote]
Thanks Klaus
Much better, I don`t mind odd numbers at all.
Yes, understood. I fixed it to some degree. I wanted to reduce the scale anyway because 2750 LW/PH were only achieved by the Pana 20 and the other lenses stood quite short of that. I was thinking of a [900, 2650] scale rather than [1000,2750]. It's now at [990,2640] - this is a bit odd, I know. However, the javascript engine is not that flexible at this stage (it takes 330 LW/PH steps from zero if you look deeper here but this is somewhat orbitary).
[/quote]
Thanks Klaus
Much better, I don`t mind odd numbers at all.