07-11-2011, 11:56 AM
I know, and I did. There's two samples from the HX9V in better light. I didn't re-do the ones from the Canon since that correctly lengthened the exposure to compensate. It does show that the HX9V logic might not be as good as I thought earlier, as in this case it appears it may have compromised exposure probably to balance other settings such as shake prevention.
And to save myself another post, I think the general conclusion here is that, under good lighting conditions I'm surprised how close it got to a SLR. I wasn't even expecting that much. In worse light, it does seem to fall off more. I never expected it to replace my Canons, and once again, it is good enough for what I want.
And to save myself another post, I think the general conclusion here is that, under good lighting conditions I'm surprised how close it got to a SLR. I wasn't even expecting that much. In worse light, it does seem to fall off more. I never expected it to replace my Canons, and once again, it is good enough for what I want.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.