07-18-2011, 02:48 PM
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1310997192' post='10124']
A strange selection of hugely expensive as well as big and heavy Zuiko lenses, which have been built for a by now pretty obsolete system. The 50/2 is said to be one of the sharpest on this planet and would surely be of interest. It is also somewhat more affordable than the other stuff on your list. Finally, there are some equivalent offers around when you have the MFT mount in mind:
Olympus Zuiko 7-14mm f/4 - one would probably prefer the Pana 7-14, a native MFT lens, and way cheaper too.
Olympus Zuiko 150mm f/2 - the Canon 135 mm f/2.0 L is very nice, at less than half the money and weight.
[/quote]
How do the Olympus 150mm f2 and Canon 135mm f2 L USM compare???
The Olympus is 300mm f4 full frame equivalent.
So, it would be more sensible to compare it to a Canon EF 300mm f4 L IS USM.
Or on APS-C? Then it would be more sensible to compare it to a Canon EF 200mm f2.8 L USM II.
A strange selection of hugely expensive as well as big and heavy Zuiko lenses, which have been built for a by now pretty obsolete system. The 50/2 is said to be one of the sharpest on this planet and would surely be of interest. It is also somewhat more affordable than the other stuff on your list. Finally, there are some equivalent offers around when you have the MFT mount in mind:
Olympus Zuiko 7-14mm f/4 - one would probably prefer the Pana 7-14, a native MFT lens, and way cheaper too.
Olympus Zuiko 150mm f/2 - the Canon 135 mm f/2.0 L is very nice, at less than half the money and weight.
[/quote]
How do the Olympus 150mm f2 and Canon 135mm f2 L USM compare???
The Olympus is 300mm f4 full frame equivalent.
So, it would be more sensible to compare it to a Canon EF 300mm f4 L IS USM.
Or on APS-C? Then it would be more sensible to compare it to a Canon EF 200mm f2.8 L USM II.