Field curvature is irrelevant for the charts - the test spots are locally refocused.
There are sample images in the full format tests so I skipped these for APS-C (as usual).
The sample images reflect the real life.
I once did as you suggested - thus pushing the weaknesses in the same image section. All I got was criticism that nobody would shoot images like these. At that stage I then decided that I did not want to moderate a gazillion messages about inappropriate samples.
> Any idea, why one want a FF fast prime on a half size sensor?
Well ...
For better corners ?
Less vignetting ?
Less distortions ?
Better bokeh in the corners ?
Because you want to upgrade at some stage ?
Because there's no native 24mm f/1.4 for APS-C ?
For tele lenses - because you'd like more reach ?
There are sample images in the full format tests so I skipped these for APS-C (as usual).
The sample images reflect the real life.
I once did as you suggested - thus pushing the weaknesses in the same image section. All I got was criticism that nobody would shoot images like these. At that stage I then decided that I did not want to moderate a gazillion messages about inappropriate samples.
> Any idea, why one want a FF fast prime on a half size sensor?
Well ...
For better corners ?
Less vignetting ?
Less distortions ?
Better bokeh in the corners ?
Because you want to upgrade at some stage ?
Because there's no native 24mm f/1.4 for APS-C ?
For tele lenses - because you'd like more reach ?