Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive?
#21
Quote: 

 

Then, it's just a matter of what you shoot. For instance, I'm strongly considering (re)buying into MFT for the long lenses options, especially when Oly will release their 300mm f4. Nothing in the market can give you that reach in such a small form factor. Also, with such long lenses, I don't find the lack of DOF control to be an issue at all.
My wife was so dissatisfied with her Olympus 75-300, that she first got herself a K-30 and a HD DA55-300, a great combination for BIF (birds in flight) photography.

 

Then she went one step further with a 70-300CX on a Nikon V2, a superb lens on a nice camera, a much sharper lens in its long end than most lenses I have tried, possibly sharper than the new Nikon 300mm lens (yes, I have used that one, practical size, yes, and nice in every respect, and just like the 70-300CX using the latest lens coatings; happy to say both work well on a Nikon 1 camera!).
  


Messages In This Thread
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 01:19 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 09:24 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 09:53 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)