Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements)

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements)

Guest
Unregistered

06-16-2015, 08:09 AM

Yep. A 12mm f4.5 would be best to keep the weight down!

Maybe a redesign of the Voigltander? But I'm a bit disappointed with the redesigned Voigt 15; it doesn't have the corner mush but the copy I borrowed just was not super sharp and contrasty. It was fine; but clearly not as good as the FE zoom at 16 mm and you would hope for better...

Messages In This Thread

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by Brightcolours - 06-16-2015, 06:01 AM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by Rover - 06-16-2015, 06:33 AM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by Guest - 06-16-2015, 08:09 AM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by davidmanze - 06-16-2015, 09:24 AM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by Brightcolours - 06-16-2015, 11:14 AM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by toni-a - 06-16-2015, 07:10 PM

Another "because we can" lens design (with expensive elements) - by Guest - 06-17-2015, 03:09 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)