The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 895 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.2.24-0ubuntu0.18.04.8 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 895 errorHandler->error




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs?
#1
Not sure if anyone can dig up MTF info for the 55/2.8 micro AI-S but I have tested one today.

 

Real focal length: 54.881mm

 

On-axis MTF results:

 

10lp/mm - 90%

 

20lp/mm - astigmatism becomes real - tangential plane at about 86-87% sagittal plane at 70%.

 

30lp/mm - 60% / 55%

 

40lp/mm - about  45% in each plane

 

The field curvature / astigmatism at infinity is "pretty strong" - the two planes peak in MTF almost 100um apart.  In terms of raw values this is quite intense - 100um is almost 20px of blur or so but in terms of the grand scheme of things it is not bad.  .1mm astigmatism is alright - because this is on-axis it points to some misalignment within the lens or tilt in the test system but it is not a bad result.

 

Here is the spot from the lens: http://i.imgur.com/82BxEKE.jpg

 

---

 

To break things down - MTF50% is about 35lp/mm here.  35lp/mm * 2 * 36mm = 2520px of "real resolution" on a full-frame sensor which could realistically be pushed to about 3000px.

  


Messages In This Thread
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs? - by Scythels - 02-19-2015, 12:08 AM
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs? - by Scythels - 02-19-2015, 02:40 PM
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs? - by Scythels - 02-20-2015, 03:30 AM
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs? - by Scythels - 02-20-2015, 07:13 PM
Quick evaluate - how accurate are nikon's specs? - by Scythels - 02-20-2015, 10:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)