06-19-2012, 12:48 PM
[quote name='goran h' timestamp='1340108478' post='18971']
Don´t know how the 14/2.5 lens is with this specific wa-converter, but in general you lose a lot in image quality. Most wa-converters are cheap, and you get what you pay for. Wa-converters are mainly used for film.
Göran
[/quote]
The Sony NEX WA converter was tested here along with the E16mm lens. The results seemed pretty good, all things considered, in that it didn't significantly degrade the IQ. The biggest issues for me would be that the WA converter adds complex distortion and I don't think the EXIF data would reflect the converted field of view. But for ~$130 it's not a huge risk combined with the 14mm lens.
Don´t know how the 14/2.5 lens is with this specific wa-converter, but in general you lose a lot in image quality. Most wa-converters are cheap, and you get what you pay for. Wa-converters are mainly used for film.
Göran
[/quote]
The Sony NEX WA converter was tested here along with the E16mm lens. The results seemed pretty good, all things considered, in that it didn't significantly degrade the IQ. The biggest issues for me would be that the WA converter adds complex distortion and I don't think the EXIF data would reflect the converted field of view. But for ~$130 it's not a huge risk combined with the 14mm lens.