Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8
#6
[quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1332698991' post='17037']

It seems to me that this is not only a problem of this particular lens but that the entire lens mount is flawed because of the very small flange back distance.

[/quote]

Then why can you get better results with a 5N? They just need to take care with the sensor design, and things work out ok. The short flange distance is a plus, it keeps the camera body compact, wider angle lenses compact and offers a lot of possibilities adapting different mounts including M39 screw mount and M-mount.
  


Messages In This Thread
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by Yakim - 03-24-2012, 10:07 PM
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by Guest - 03-25-2012, 12:47 PM
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by Tiz - 03-25-2012, 06:09 PM
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by Brightcolours - 03-25-2012, 06:24 PM
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by kapitan.koop - 03-26-2012, 02:24 AM
next PZ lens test report: Sony E 16mm f/2.8 - by Yakim - 03-26-2012, 07:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)