08-26-2011, 09:17 AM
[quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1314347073' post='11035']
Has anyone processed these RAWs and compared them with other cameras?
[url="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA77/AA77A7.HTM"]http://www.imaging-r...AA77/AA77A7.HTM[/url]
[/quote]
Well, the provided RAWs were processed with the Sony converter I guess. The converter produces quite sharp results actually on the NEX so I reckon we are now seeing the 77 potential here for the better or worse.
Looking at the center portion the quality seems reasonably good to me (ISO 200 RAW).
The higher ISO stuff looks smeared - no idea whether this is because of NR by the converter or the sensor though.
They haven't used the sharpest lens for this. In any case - no surprises regarding the effective resolution - 24mp are simply a borderline thing for most lenses.
FWIW, the NEX7 will be a tad sharper due to the missing mirror. That's also something that we've seen in our local tests with the A33 vs NEX5.
Has anyone processed these RAWs and compared them with other cameras?
[url="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA77/AA77A7.HTM"]http://www.imaging-r...AA77/AA77A7.HTM[/url]
[/quote]
Well, the provided RAWs were processed with the Sony converter I guess. The converter produces quite sharp results actually on the NEX so I reckon we are now seeing the 77 potential here for the better or worse.
Looking at the center portion the quality seems reasonably good to me (ISO 200 RAW).
The higher ISO stuff looks smeared - no idea whether this is because of NR by the converter or the sensor though.
They haven't used the sharpest lens for this. In any case - no surprises regarding the effective resolution - 24mp are simply a borderline thing for most lenses.
FWIW, the NEX7 will be a tad sharper due to the missing mirror. That's also something that we've seen in our local tests with the A33 vs NEX5.