06-05-2011, 08:13 AM
[quote name='[PB]' timestamp='1307205145' post='9029']
I can't seem to load the bokeh fringing section on this 50mm 1.4D FX review. Is anyone else having this issue? [/quote]
Works for me. What's the error you're seeing? Does any of the images load?
[quote name='[PB]' timestamp='1307205145' post='9029']
Also, Markus, which do you feel is the better lens optically at 1.8 or 2.0: The 50mm 1.4D or the new 50mm 1.8G? I believe that the 50mm 1.8G may have the edge for tracking fast moving subjects due to the SWM.
[/quote]
It depends a bit where your preferences are. Personally, I'd go with the AF-S 50/1.8 because of its better bokeh.
I did not try tracking subjects. In general, the AF-D lenses (both f/1.4 and f/1.8) focus faster on my cameras, but the difference is not really noticeable for small focus changes. The precision of AF-S lenses when tracking might be higher, though.
-- Markus
I can't seem to load the bokeh fringing section on this 50mm 1.4D FX review. Is anyone else having this issue? [/quote]
Works for me. What's the error you're seeing? Does any of the images load?
[quote name='[PB]' timestamp='1307205145' post='9029']
Also, Markus, which do you feel is the better lens optically at 1.8 or 2.0: The 50mm 1.4D or the new 50mm 1.8G? I believe that the 50mm 1.8G may have the edge for tracking fast moving subjects due to the SWM.
[/quote]
It depends a bit where your preferences are. Personally, I'd go with the AF-S 50/1.8 because of its better bokeh.
I did not try tracking subjects. In general, the AF-D lenses (both f/1.4 and f/1.8) focus faster on my cameras, but the difference is not really noticeable for small focus changes. The precision of AF-S lenses when tracking might be higher, though.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com