02-24-2011, 06:22 PM
so I'm sure this is not a "tester error" or "measurement method", as "individual approach" or a human factor in the CA measurements could be really misleading.
what is it, then? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />) why such a difference of the same lens, giving such different results on the sensors, that are more or less close in resolution. that looks very-very strange, but interesting <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />))
could it be a sensor behaviour? microlenses?
what is it, then? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />) why such a difference of the same lens, giving such different results on the sensors, that are more or less close in resolution. that looks very-very strange, but interesting <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />))
could it be a sensor behaviour? microlenses?