12-02-2010, 11:06 PM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1291282950' post='4686']
I find his reviews on his site a bit "light", but the "Complete Guide" books include a lot of information (at least for an amateur like me). Can you suggest other authors in this area? I always believe in reading from different ressources for the same topic.
[/quote]
Serkan... there's nothing wrong in reading anything out there. For example, from guys like Thom Hogan, Lloyd Chambers, Ken Rockwell I learned about photographic concepts that people can misunderstand but still make people think that they know enough to write about them.
So my advice is to read things that have little to no writing-fluff in them. More to the point/scientific the article is, the fewer things can be said wrong or be misinterpreted by the reader. Afterall, nothing can be said/read wrong when there's no writing, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
I find his reviews on his site a bit "light", but the "Complete Guide" books include a lot of information (at least for an amateur like me). Can you suggest other authors in this area? I always believe in reading from different ressources for the same topic.
[/quote]
Serkan... there's nothing wrong in reading anything out there. For example, from guys like Thom Hogan, Lloyd Chambers, Ken Rockwell I learned about photographic concepts that people can misunderstand but still make people think that they know enough to write about them.
So my advice is to read things that have little to no writing-fluff in them. More to the point/scientific the article is, the fewer things can be said wrong or be misinterpreted by the reader. Afterall, nothing can be said/read wrong when there's no writing, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW