10-17-2010, 03:06 PM
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1284381432' post='2705']
Do you really need such technical review?
The most photographic workshops, tutorial and lessons are done with Adobe ACR + Photoshop. The easy coupling ACR /e.g Photohop via Smart object/ can easily evaporate some advantages of different RAW converter.
[/quote]
In that other thread someone pointed out the obvious flaw of the ACR+Photoshop workflow: It is always a 2-step process, you cannot change, for example, white balance after editing your image in Photoshop.
Besides that, there may be people that see RAW just as the digital negative and do not want to do anything beyond the conversion step, i.e., no per-pixel editing with Photoshop.
These people might ask the question of Lightroom vs. Capture One. After all, there is still no need for a review, because the answer is clearly Capture One, as anyscreenamewilldo already said. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Do you really need such technical review?
The most photographic workshops, tutorial and lessons are done with Adobe ACR + Photoshop. The easy coupling ACR /e.g Photohop via Smart object/ can easily evaporate some advantages of different RAW converter.
[/quote]
In that other thread someone pointed out the obvious flaw of the ACR+Photoshop workflow: It is always a 2-step process, you cannot change, for example, white balance after editing your image in Photoshop.
Besides that, there may be people that see RAW just as the digital negative and do not want to do anything beyond the conversion step, i.e., no per-pixel editing with Photoshop.
These people might ask the question of Lightroom vs. Capture One. After all, there is still no need for a review, because the answer is clearly Capture One, as anyscreenamewilldo already said. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />