08-08-2010, 12:09 PM
[quote name='geriatric' timestamp='1281076516' post='1534']
Hi, This may have been entered before, but I need to know the answer. The Tamron 28-75mm lens on Canon and Nikon verdicts are different.Nikon say resolution very good, while Canon say not to good. Is this because Nikon test it as a crop and Canon as full frame. The lens being poor on the periphery. One remarked "A good lens if you get a good one" Is it a case of "you pays your money and you takes a chance".
[/quote]
This is some info also on the 28-75 Tamron.
[url="http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/canon_24-105_sigma_24-70_tamron_28-75.htm"]http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/canon_24-105_sigma_24-70_tamron_28-75.htm[/url]
Hi, This may have been entered before, but I need to know the answer. The Tamron 28-75mm lens on Canon and Nikon verdicts are different.Nikon say resolution very good, while Canon say not to good. Is this because Nikon test it as a crop and Canon as full frame. The lens being poor on the periphery. One remarked "A good lens if you get a good one" Is it a case of "you pays your money and you takes a chance".
[/quote]
This is some info also on the 28-75 Tamron.
[url="http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/canon_24-105_sigma_24-70_tamron_28-75.htm"]http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/canon_24-105_sigma_24-70_tamron_28-75.htm[/url]