06-10-2018, 10:58 AM
Wow, I was getting ready for a "bloodbath" seeing as how this is a non-L lens tested on the (lens killer) 5DSR but this looks good. As always, such a long wait for a review that's been devoured in less than 5 minutes in my case. 
I have spotted a few issues with the text (being the designated Mad Proofreader and all) but I'll get to those later... if you don't mind.
Oh, and the only gripe with the review per se is that I wish there had been the fourth datapoint at - say - 135mm. 70 to 200mm is a long stretch, and I know that my Tamron 70-300 VC works great at 135mm (even as a 135mm f/4.5 prime if the situation warrants).
I have spotted a few issues with the text (being the designated Mad Proofreader and all) but I'll get to those later... if you don't mind.
Oh, and the only gripe with the review per se is that I wish there had been the fourth datapoint at - say - 135mm. 70 to 200mm is a long stretch, and I know that my Tamron 70-300 VC works great at 135mm (even as a 135mm f/4.5 prime if the situation warrants).