And the point is...? That a clueless author publishing far-fetched attempts at analysis 2,5 years ago was wrong? Well, duh.
(I laughed a few times because that article was so fishy... like trying to push the image of a 24/2 lens instead of a 85/1.4 and drawing conclusions from that... or comparing the size of an APS-C lens to a full frame one with the same stats. To be honest I didn't really read through it because I have better things to do with my life so far.
)
(I laughed a few times because that article was so fishy... like trying to push the image of a 24/2 lens instead of a 85/1.4 and drawing conclusions from that... or comparing the size of an APS-C lens to a full frame one with the same stats. To be honest I didn't really read through it because I have better things to do with my life so far.
)