Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roger Cicala unfanboy Opinion about Canon/Nikon mirrorless cameras
#5
(09-12-2018, 09:52 AM)you2 Wrote: I think he raises valid points. I've been in the boat of thinking nikon days are numbered for various reasons. The other thing I noticed when comparing nikon/canon offering to fuji/sony is size. Yes fuji has large cameras and lenses but they also have relatively small cameras and lenses. The initial offerings from canon/nikon are large so what is the point of being mirror-less? If you wanted a large camera/lens then just get the slr version. I would have expected the initial offerings to be as small as possible given the lens mount and full frame constraints. Anyway time will tell - but canon can take time to get there - nikon needs to rush.

Yeah, Fuji has large cameras for APS-C and MF. The MF-lenses do not offer the DOF possibilities that Canon/Nikon offer in FF, so not sure what the point is. The APS-C  is... APS-C.

Nikon does offer small cameras and lenses. Canon does offer small cameras and lenses. Neither use the without-virtue weird CFA arrangement that Fuji does, which should be considered a plus.

SMALL mirrorless cameras have the virtue of being small. SMALL cameras also have the "virtue" of really crap ergonomics. Is your position that mirrorless HAS to have really crap ergonomics? Tongue

Fuji continues to be quite unattractive in the marketplace, their market share is not big and not exactly growing much.
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Roger Cicala unfanboy Opinion about Canon/Nikon mirrorless cameras - by Brightcolours - 09-12-2018, 11:08 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)