01-30-2017, 11:07 AM
Apparently you were just a bit too ecstatic? Or are the double lateral CA?
Anyway, the review makes me think a lot. Tooooo bad, it's only so good on a dated D3x
Now, I need to ask: How many stars you would give to a lense like that being an APO and coming along without bokeh fringing? 6? 5 1/2?
By using all stars for a lense which leaves still a bit to wish for, you went to the end of the scale, meaning "Manufacturers, it's pointless to try better - we ran out of stars"
edit: I just checked on lensscore.org: They rate lenses independently from camera sensors.
Otus 85/1.4: 1459 points
Nikon 105/1.4: 1044 points
40% more performance would be just a 7 star rating, hope you have some leftovers.
edit 2: Here comes the grain of salt: The very same lenscore gave 1000 points to the Nikon 85/1.4G. Which I already doubted and now even more, after looking at the single categories and in each of them that lense scores exactly also 1000 points. No way.
Quote:Unlike lateral lateral CAs
Anyway, the review makes me think a lot. Tooooo bad, it's only so good on a dated D3x
Now, I need to ask: How many stars you would give to a lense like that being an APO and coming along without bokeh fringing? 6? 5 1/2?
By using all stars for a lense which leaves still a bit to wish for, you went to the end of the scale, meaning "Manufacturers, it's pointless to try better - we ran out of stars"
edit: I just checked on lensscore.org: They rate lenses independently from camera sensors.
Otus 85/1.4: 1459 points
Nikon 105/1.4: 1044 points
40% more performance would be just a 7 star rating, hope you have some leftovers.
edit 2: Here comes the grain of salt: The very same lenscore gave 1000 points to the Nikon 85/1.4G. Which I already doubted and now even more, after looking at the single categories and in each of them that lense scores exactly also 1000 points. No way.