05-09-2019, 01:47 PM
I know what you're saying, and it is very difficult to explain. Micro contrast ... yes, maybe. I know the term, and it certainly isn't "just" sharpness. It's like it's micro contrast, but not just in the sense of more or less contrast, but in terms of even/consistent representation of contrast in subtle differences. It's like I see the pixel resolution (perceptual megapixels in Dxomark terms) being pretty much the same, but it's a bit "busy" through the Samyang 35, and it just bugs me a bit. I think that maybe even if the new 45 has the exact same "issue", I will still be happier with it because of the 1.8 aperture, so I can get better separation from the background, and that way I won't sit with the same sense of the whole image being a bit busy.
Anyway, I can't wait to test it. :-)
Anyway, I can't wait to test it. :-)