Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mirrorless cameras - (often) form over function?
#3
The FP is more boxy and less easy to use than my old EOS M. That takes a lot of effort, to make a camera this unergonomic. For the rest, it lacks an AA-filter, not sure why. And it lacks a mechanical shutter, of which they say the lack is one of the reasons why this camera can be this small. Nonsensical, the much smaller EOS M has a mechanical shutter. They say it has a sensor with very fast sensor read out to minimise rolling shutter. Fast? No... the 1/15th flash sync shows it is just as slow as other cameras. That means the same rolling shutter issues as for instance the RP and other cameras in silent shutter mode, and a standard issue with big apertures/short exposure times. And artificial light banding issues.

The odd 45mm f2.8's purpose is clear now, to be paired with the FP as small combination. I don't get that idea though, the big thing about FF is to be able to use bigger apertures, but with this lens you do not have that FF advantage.


.png   Screen Shot 2019-07-12 at 09.53.06.png (Size: 206.62 KB / Downloads: 4)
Oh well, no doubt Sigma will have another big hit on their hands.
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mirrorless cameras - (often) form over function? - by Brightcolours - 07-12-2019, 07:54 AM
RE: Mirrorless cameras - (often) form over function? - by davidmanze - 07-14-2019, 08:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)