08-22-2019, 04:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-22-2019, 04:11 PM by Brightcolours.)
In my opinion, the only reason to consider FF over APS-C is if you are interested in the possibility of more shallow DOF (and you have access to FF lenses that provide that, or the finances to acquire them).
When you use equivalent settings, FF does not offer any real advantage.
Another possibility to look at certain FF cameras is the higher resolution sensors, making big prints with more details possible with single shots (think Canon EOS 5DS, Sony A7r IV). But you need expensive lenses to take full advantage of such resolutions too, so things get expensive very quickly.
So, it depends on what you look for, and what you feel you lack now, if FF is something to go for, or not.
When you use equivalent settings, FF does not offer any real advantage.
Another possibility to look at certain FF cameras is the higher resolution sensors, making big prints with more details possible with single shots (think Canon EOS 5DS, Sony A7r IV). But you need expensive lenses to take full advantage of such resolutions too, so things get expensive very quickly.
So, it depends on what you look for, and what you feel you lack now, if FF is something to go for, or not.