Not taking defence of Canon APS-C but you have all Canon EF lenses available for APS-C and that's a huge amount of lenses
Have used Canon APS-C for 15 years and was never disappointed.
Why Canon didn't make any 10 12mm and 16mm primes ? that's another question Tokina did make a very decent 10-20f2.8 but nobody was interested
Sigma made a very good 50-150f2.8 OS DC HSM, even APS-C users prefered 70-200f2.8 OS HSM despite price, size and weight advantages, IMHO if you have full frame and APS-C there's no point making dedicated tele lenses for APS-C on the primes side only pancakes and ultrawide primes would be interesting, who would buy EFS50mmf1.8 when you already have EF50mmf1.8 ? unless it offers a major advantage
I actually use 7Dmkii and EOS RP
to my knowledgw there's nothing in Fuji mount not covered in Canon APS-C (except maybe 16mmf2.0 autofocus)
Have used Canon APS-C for 15 years and was never disappointed.
Why Canon didn't make any 10 12mm and 16mm primes ? that's another question Tokina did make a very decent 10-20f2.8 but nobody was interested
Sigma made a very good 50-150f2.8 OS DC HSM, even APS-C users prefered 70-200f2.8 OS HSM despite price, size and weight advantages, IMHO if you have full frame and APS-C there's no point making dedicated tele lenses for APS-C on the primes side only pancakes and ultrawide primes would be interesting, who would buy EFS50mmf1.8 when you already have EF50mmf1.8 ? unless it offers a major advantage
I actually use 7Dmkii and EOS RP
to my knowledgw there's nothing in Fuji mount not covered in Canon APS-C (except maybe 16mmf2.0 autofocus)