Opticallimits > Forums > Canon EOS > Lens rumours for RF and EF-M
Opticallimits > Forums > Canon EOS > Lens rumours for RF and EF-M

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Lens rumours for RF and EF-M
Brightcolours Offline
All-Star
*****
Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 22
#3
03-24-2020, 08:13 AM
(03-24-2020, 07:03 AM)Rover Wrote: The focal lengths surely are odd. But maybe someone at Canon is also obsessed with numbers, and happens to like even figures better than the odd ones. Smile
The other focal lengths are not that odd, actually.
22mm : 35mm FF equivalent
32mm: 50mm FF equivalent
15mm: 24mm FF equivalent
62mm: 100mm FF equivalent.

Just the 52mm seems a little bit off: 83.4 mm FF equivalent where 53mm would be 84.8mm FF equivalent. Seeing how they tried t "exactly" match equivalent focal lengths (22, 32mm), it just seems a bit off.
Find
Reply
  


Messages In This Thread
Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Brightcolours - 03-23-2020, 02:38 PM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Rover - 03-24-2020, 07:03 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Brightcolours - 03-24-2020, 08:13 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Klaus - 03-24-2020, 09:46 PM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by toni-a - 03-25-2020, 08:52 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Klaus - 03-25-2020, 09:55 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by toni-a - 03-25-2020, 10:39 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by Klaus - 03-25-2020, 11:05 AM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by toni-a - 03-25-2020, 01:27 PM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by davidmanze - 03-26-2020, 02:59 PM
RE: Lens rumours for RF and EF-M - by davidmanze - 03-26-2020, 09:11 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)