[Klaus]

I've just watched a video where, as so often, a variable max aperture was mentioned as a negative.

I, for one, never had an issue with a variable max aperture ... ever.

I get that a faster max aperture is better than a slower one, but this relates more to sophistication ... and, consequently, the higher price you have to pay for the privilege. 

e.g. I'd rather have an 18-55mm f/2.8-4 than -say- an 18-55mm f/3.5. 

So what's the point?