Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
considering a switch back to primes
#15
Why does it have to be EITHER primes OR zooms? A good zoom like the 16-35/4L IS (I know I'm sounding like a stuck record here) replaces a bag of primes and adds a lot on top. Get that (or a similar Nikon if you're on that system) and keep a few primes (50 + 85/100) above that.

The Sigma 20/1.8 doesn't look like a good lens even in the old APS-C test (on Canon 350D Klaus used in the days of yore). Coupled with it being an old type Sigma with all the attendant mechanical, ahem, peculiarities, I would not want to go back to it.
  


Messages In This Thread
considering a switch back to primes - by toni-a - 07-20-2016, 05:46 PM
considering a switch back to primes - by sunny.t.yap - 07-21-2016, 01:28 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by toni-a - 07-21-2016, 03:27 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by joachim - 07-21-2016, 08:42 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by joachim - 07-21-2016, 09:13 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by JJ_SO - 07-21-2016, 10:04 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by joachim - 07-21-2016, 01:12 PM
considering a switch back to primes - by JJ_SO - 07-21-2016, 03:12 PM
considering a switch back to primes - by toni-a - 07-21-2016, 03:51 PM
considering a switch back to primes - by Rover - 07-22-2016, 07:41 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by davidmanze - 07-22-2016, 08:56 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by Rainer - 07-23-2016, 09:32 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by toni-a - 07-23-2016, 09:27 PM
considering a switch back to primes - by toni-a - 08-03-2016, 11:56 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by Rover - 08-04-2016, 09:39 AM
considering a switch back to primes - by wim - 08-11-2016, 08:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)