Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS
#6
Quote:... it is not about low light capacity but about sharpness, bokeh and what you ask from a portrait lens....
That point's toward the Sigma, if you want such a lens for 750 D.

 

Actually I have no idea how a 1.5 kg lens would fit in the "hiking" bag - but that goes as well for the 70-200/2.8!

And the basic problem with your hiking bag is simply "weight and size of body and lenses are bigger than any comparable mirrorless system"

 

What's to say against the 70-200/4?
  


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Klaus - 05-20-2016, 11:31 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Rover - 05-23-2016, 02:36 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 03:37 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 07:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)