|
|
|
11-02-2013, 12:54 PM
I was going to say sigma 60f2.8 but the comment on the 35-100 suggest after wide open the resolution should be decreasing; the sigma is availble for NEX and it is one of the sharpest lenses in existent but the profile of the curve doesn't fit; unless it sharpens up a bit after wide open.
11-05-2013, 03:15 PM
Well he just posted the preview of the fuji 27 and tamron 90; i'm 99% sure it is not the 27mm....
Quote:Sigma 180mm macro? 
11-05-2013, 03:44 PM
Quote:Well he just posted the preview of the fuji 27 and tamron 90; i'm 99% sure it is not the 27mm....http://www.lenstip.com/361.4-Lens_review...ution.html could be, yes...
11-05-2013, 07:26 PM
Perhaps you meant this link; btw they have an interesting comment how they had to change the test:
http://www.lenstip.com/385.4-Lens_review...ution.html
11-06-2013, 03:40 AM
The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.
11-06-2013, 01:56 PM
Yes I quite agree it is unlikely the 27mm; for some reason last night I was confused by bright's response. Still I find it quite interesting just how many 'good' 90mm lens exist. It begins to beg the question of why we need more (though I see this one adds vc as the key new feature).
- I am somewhat concern about fuji QC (I guess this comment is related to the fuji thread I just read) but overall they seem to have a nice system if you like their cameras (form factor) which I do. Quote:The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.
11-06-2013, 02:45 PM
Quote:The lenstip shows that the 27mm has bad border resolutions. So I am sure it is the Tamron 90mm.This was one of the first suggestions and Klaus said "nope". :wacko: |
