• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Sony A55 - fps compensating AF speed
#11
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1305658456' post='8450']

- Aha, I don't understand why Sony (or indeed Minolta before) does (did) not upgrade the 70-210 beercan

[/quote]





Forget about what Sony did or didn't do. You don't own Sony. What's your problem then? Stick with telling us about your "wonderful" 450D.
  Reply
#12
Stop it, please.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  Reply
#13
[quote name='olegk' timestamp='1305650577' post='8422']

(I know the community here tends to dislike my pictures, but this time I need some to demonstrate the case.)



I claim that in many practical cases high continuous-shooting frame rate of the Sony A55 can compensate for the presumed AF-speed deficiency.



I don't really care whether the camera fitted with 50mm f/1.4 in someone's hands can track an approaching train.

What I already know, is that in my hands, when fitted with either 16-80 f/3.5-4.5 or 70-210 f/4, it's unable to track my dog running towards me.



So, my solution is to preset the focus for the desired subject size, set the 6 fps or 10 fps mode, and keep the shutter pressed for approximately a second at the right moment.

After several rounds I'm rewarded with 1-2 usable pictures.



By the way, the dog's picture here is taken with an MF lens - Jupiter 37 - 135mm f/3.5 - made in USSR in early 80s. It has enormous number of aperture blades, and thus greatly outperforms the 70-210 set at 135mm in defocusing the background trees.



The flower-and-bug picture was taken with the 16-80 and 10 fps. The swinging of my head with the attached camera did the focus-guess job.

[/quote]

Unfortunately I have to second that - tracking a running dog gives really tough job to your camera, especially if the dog is not particularly big but very bouncy.



I found myself in a similar situation: while Nikon D300 has supposedly efficient "3D" tracking, it still wastes over half of frames during this task. So at the end of the day I had to buy a battery grip to keep up with my dog, lol <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />



P.s. Google says it's 12 blades.
  Reply
#14
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1305707406' post='8477']



P.s. Google says it's 12 blades.

[/quote]

Thanks <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />, I tried to google it, but not site I found went further than the basic specs. Good looking lens, by the way.
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)