• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Sony A6300 + new lenses + teleconverters
#11
Still catching up. This body is more interesting to me than any A7 series, and if that AF tracking holds up like they claim this might finally cross the break even point with DSLRs for my uses. Slap the 70-200 + 2x on it and it might be an interesting wildlife combo (or preferably wait for a native longer zoom). The selling point will hinge on the AF performance though.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  Reply
#12
A thought has crossed my mind: there's a lot of different filter sizes being used through the range (49 - 67 - 72 - and now also 77 and 82). Some people are going to be irate. I'm almost glad I standardized my junk on 77mm again (3 lenses in that size and just one in 62; there's also a pseudo-72mm lens that has no use for a filter whatsoever Smile).

  Reply
#13
Quote:Still catching up. This body is more interesting to me than any A7 series, and if that AF tracking holds up like they claim this might finally cross the break even point with DSLRs for my uses. Slap the 70-200 + 2x on it and it might be an interesting wildlife combo (or preferably wait for a native longer zoom). The selling point will hinge on the AF performance though.
 

Sony increases the pressure to Nikon and Canon massively imo. 
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)