[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1314165480' post='10896']
NEX:
50mm f/1.8: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/dsl-aps-c-lenses/sel-50f18
55-210mm f/4.5-6.3: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/ddl-telephoto-lenses/sel-55210
Zeiss 24mm f/1.8: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/ddl-wide-angle-lenses/sel-24f18z
Alpha:
16-50/2.8: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/ddl-aps-c-lenses/sal-1650
No G ?
[/quote]
Did you notice that the Zeiss 24mm is a Sonnar instead of a Distagon/Biogon?
http://flickr.com/ephankim
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1314199815' post='10935']
Did you notice that the Zeiss 24mm is a Sonnar instead of a Distagon/Biogon?
[/quote]
I reckon that everything faster than f/2 is a Sonnar.
SLRgear already has the review for 16-50mm lens
[url="http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1449/cat/83"]http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1449/cat/83[/url]
08-24-2011, 06:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2011, 06:11 PM by WyldRage.)
I've read the SLRgear review, and it looks like a nice lens: WR, sharp, good speed, and low to moderate distortion.
It's the lack of such a lens in Pentax land that has kept me away from the K-mount.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1314206877' post='10938']
I reckon that everything faster than f/2 is a Sonnar.
[/quote]
The new 35/1.4 ZE/ZF.2 is a Distagon.
http://flickr.com/ephankim
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1314165480' post='10896']
Alpha:
16-50/2.8: http://www.sony.co.uk/product/ddl-aps-c-lenses/sal-1650
No G ?
[/quote]
Already tested:
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1449/cat/83
And looks quite good...
http://flickr.com/ephankim
FWIW, the MTFs are also available on the Sony JP homepage.
16-50/2.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SAL1650/feature_1.html#L1_30
55-210:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL55210/feature_1.html#L1_30
50/1.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL50F18/feature_1.html#L1_30
24/1.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL24F18Z/feature_1.html#L1_30
The Zeiss MTFs are not cross-comparable due to the different frequencies.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1314247528' post='10958']
FWIW, the MTFs are also available on the Sony JP homepage.
16-50/2.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SAL1650/feature_1.html#L1_30
55-210:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL55210/feature_1.html#L1_30
50/1.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL50F18/feature_1.html#L1_30
24/1.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL24F18Z/feature_1.html#L1_30
The Zeiss MTFs are not cross-comparable due to the different frequencies.
[/quote]
All the lens elements are much smaller than the diameter of the lenses. Sony didn't try to miniaturize that much. Looks like a standard diameter for all the lenses.
http://flickr.com/ephankim
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1314247528' post='10958']
FWIW, the MTFs are also available on the Sony JP homepage.
24/1.8:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SEL24F18Z/feature_1.html#L1_30
The Zeiss MTFs are not cross-comparable due to the different frequencies.
[/quote]
The curves should be more "flat" at F8 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
The FF 24/2ZA:
http://www.sony.jp/ichigan/products/SAL24F20Z/feature_1.html#L1_40
http://flickr.com/ephankim
The lens cross section SEL50F1.8 looks very different to the SAL50F1.8. The MTFs wide open are better too. Can anyone explain what type of lens design is used?
