09-20-2011, 05:34 PM
3cm. WOW! That's very close. You're likely to shadow the object.
|
|
09-20-2011, 05:44 PM
3cm? I wont complain about the 42mm working distance of the MPE-65 again! Then again that does have a longer focal length...
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
09-20-2011, 05:45 PM
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1316540062' post='11668']
You're likely to shadow the object. [/quote] Yep. But not only at 1:1. With normal light (from behind) the shadow becomes an issue a lot earlier. -- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
09-20-2011, 07:55 PM
I updated the review, there's now a small section dealing with working distance and the shadow the hood may cast on the first page of the review.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
09-21-2011, 07:14 AM
Thank you.
09-21-2011, 12:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-21-2011, 12:16 PM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316540704' post='11670']
Yep. But not only at 1:1. With normal light (from behind) the shadow becomes an issue a lot earlier. -- Markus [/quote] Light from the side is more attractive anyway <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='  ' />Does the Tokina 35mm f2.8 extend as much? Its front element is recessed, so it has less need of the hood.
09-21-2011, 01:18 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1316606962' post='11706']
Does the Tokina 35mm f2.8 extend as much? Its front element is recessed, so it has less need of the hood. [/quote] It extends considerably, too, but its MFD is even closer (14 cm). So, the working distance might be shorter than the Nikkor's. Unfortunately I can't measure it anymore, the lens is already gone. The Tokina's front lens however remains deeply recessed, even at 1:1. That reduces the need for a large hood. In fact, the frontmost part of the inner lens tube is actually the hood ... a small metal ring, that can even be removed (an thus marginally increases the working distance). -- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
09-21-2011, 04:22 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1316548532' post='11671']
I updated the review, there's now a small section dealing with working distance and the shadow the hood may cast on the first page of the review. -- Markus [/quote] Thanks
http://flickr.com/ephankim
10-11-2011, 06:49 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1315976383' post='11579']
The Tokina is the next DX review to be published. Not sure yet when that is going to happen, though. [/quote] What happened to this review or to the lens? You published plenty of other DX reviews.
10-11-2011, 06:59 AM
[quote name='ThomasD' timestamp='1318315774' post='12272']
What happened to this review or to the lens? You published plenty of other DX reviews. [/quote] Yes, sorry. Slight shift of priorities <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=' ' /> Don't worry, it's still on the list.-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com |
Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)