08-18-2010, 02:18 PM
On looking the comparison charts of various cameras, I found something which I did not really understand the relationship between the pixel density and effective pixels.
EOS 5D MARK II
==============
Effective pixels: 21.0 million
Pixel Density: 2.4 MP/cm^2
EOS 7D
======
Effective pixels: 18.0 million
Pixel Density: 5.4 MP/cm^2
EOS 550D
========
Effective pixels: 18.0 million
Pixel Density: 5.4 MP/cm^2
- When comparing 5D MARK II, either with EOS 7D or with EOS 550D, which one the camera produces nice image with a lens(L or non-L) operated at its sweet spot.
- Also reviews has told that 5D MARK II produces nice pictures when compared to 7D, despite having low pixel density, Is it true?
am I miss-understood something here?
EOS 5D MARK II
==============
Effective pixels: 21.0 million
Pixel Density: 2.4 MP/cm^2
EOS 7D
======
Effective pixels: 18.0 million
Pixel Density: 5.4 MP/cm^2
EOS 550D
========
Effective pixels: 18.0 million
Pixel Density: 5.4 MP/cm^2
- When comparing 5D MARK II, either with EOS 7D or with EOS 550D, which one the camera produces nice image with a lens(L or non-L) operated at its sweet spot.
- Also reviews has told that 5D MARK II produces nice pictures when compared to 7D, despite having low pixel density, Is it true?
am I miss-understood something here?