• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > NEX 6
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096

Reputation: 49
#1
03-06-2013, 10:25 PM
Not as sharp as I would have hoped. The AA filter effect is clearly visible IMHO.

  Reply
Guest
Unregistered
 
#2
03-07-2013, 09:19 AM
Quote:Not as sharp as I would have hoped. The AA filter effect is clearly visible IMHO.
dpreview measured a resolution of 2800 lp/ph and concluded that the NEX-6 must have a very light AA filter. However, the actual resolution test images they show look pretty ugly. In comparison the D7000 images for example are much cleaner/better. The NEX-6 shows plenty of moire around the resolution limit, which would argue against a strong AA filter. Could be an issue with the RAW conversion and/or there is indeed something odd with the cam hardware.
  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096

Reputation: 49
#3
03-07-2013, 10:16 AM
Quote:dpreview measured a resolution of 2800 lp/ph and concluded that the NEX-6 must have a very light AA filter. However, the actual resolution test images they show look pretty ugly. In comparison the D7000 images for example are much cleaner/better. The NEX-6 shows plenty of moire around the resolution limit, which would argue against a strong AA filter. Could be an issue with the RAW conversion and/or there is indeed something odd with the cam hardware.
 

Maybe it was the lens. I will see.
  Reply
marco
Member
***
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 165

Reputation: 0
#4
03-07-2013, 10:29 AM
Quote:Maybe it was the lens. I will see.
Do you use the kit kense? What about the 50F1.8?
  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096

Reputation: 49
#5
03-07-2013, 11:12 AM
Quote:Do you use the kit kense? What about the 50F1.8?
 

Yes, this was with the kit lens. At the moment I also have the 10-18/4 and the 35/1.8 should arrive next week.

However, I will do the NEX 6 vs 7 comparison with the 16/2.8.
  Reply
marco
Member
***
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 165

Reputation: 0
#6
03-07-2013, 11:17 AM
Quote:Yes, this was with the kit lens. At the moment I also have the 10-18/4 and the 35/1.8 should arrive next week.

However, I will do the NEX 6 vs 7 comparison with the 16/2.8.
 

Do you plan to review the 20F2.8 pancake? After some first example shots, it looks ok.
  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096

Reputation: 49
#7
03-07-2013, 11:34 AM
Quote:Do you plan to review the 20F2.8 pancake? After some first example shots, it looks ok.ailable yet.
 

Sure, but it's not available yet.
  Reply
Studor13
Unregistered
 
#8
03-07-2013, 02:27 PM
Klaus, in terms of image quality alone, how does the Nex-6 compare to say the Nex-C3?

 

I'm getting all excited about the Nex system but can't quite justify the 6 just yet.

 

Maybe you could persuade me. (With other benefits over the previous models)
  Reply
marco
Member
***
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 165

Reputation: 0
#9
03-07-2013, 02:51 PM
The NEX C3 has base ISO of 200, the 6 has base ISO of 100. So the DR of the NEX 6 at base ISO is higher than the NEX C3. Otherwise it is very simular. Maybe dxomark is helping: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/%28appareil1%29/863|0/%28brand%29/Sony/%28appareil2%29/832|0/%28brand2%29/Sony/%28appareil3%29/715|0/%28brand3%29/Sony

  Reply
Guest
Unregistered
 
#10
03-08-2013, 01:53 PM
And now there is a nex 7n begging to be tested Smile
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)