[Klaus]

... bloody awesomeness ...

 

[Brightcolours]

Some... Zeiss 135mm f2?

[Guest]

This is some wicked stuff. Curious to see what lens it is.

 

Christian

[Guest]

... bloody awesomeness ...

 

 

Well, the Canon 24mm IS remains also to be tested, though the 28mm IS version didn't do as well as this.

 

The 35mm IS is also possible, and I think that could achieve this result (the old one wasn't too bad either).

[Guest]

Well, the Canon 24mm IS remains also to be tested, though the 28mm IS version didn't do as well as this.

 

The 35mm IS is also possible, and I think that could achieve this result (the old one wasn't too bad either).

 

In hindsight, diffraction sets in quite early. So, depending on crop or FF, this could already set in around f5.6 or f8, so

it can't be a very fast lens. Probably starting at f2.8 or maybe f4.0  

 

24mm f2.8 IS?

Seems unlikely you test something like a f2.8 - f4.0 tele (>300mm) ?

[Brightcolours]

The Canon EF 300mm f2.8 L IS USM II is the top lens, so a possibility. I doubt it is wide angle-ish, that is why I thought of the 135mm zeiss.

[Guest]

75f1.8 olympus

 very sharp lens

[arvydas]

New Canon's 35mm f/2 IS USM on APS-C?

[PuxaVida]

Truely awesome (assuming that it's a FF system results)... Some more clues before we place the bets?

 

Serkan

[vodanh1982]

Guest it is on a low MP camera. That graph is killing. Leica?