• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 USM L IS II review coming ...
#11
Flat field ...

  Reply
#12
https://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/...dcast-548/

  Reply
#13
A bit weak in the corners at 24mm it seems ...

  Reply
#14
Quote:A bit weak in the corners at 24mm it seems ...
On 5DSR? I wouldn't be surprised...

  Reply
#15
Sure, on the 5Ds R. Subjectively the 16-35mm III seems to be better at 24mm.

  Reply
#16
Quote:Sure, on the 5Ds R. Subjectively the 16-35mm III seems to be better at 24mm.
Don't most of the zoom lenses have the sweet spot about 1/3 into the range anyway... Smile

  Reply
#17
Whatever weaknesses it might have I expect this lens to be a commercial success because it covers a much needed range.

In the past Canon 17-85 has had its days even for a short period.

24-105 has for a long time been a best seller so why this one won't?

Nobody is expecting it to rival primes, it offers decent quality an extremely useful range, excellent build quality, everything to make it a best seller.
  Reply
#18
Quote:Flat field ...
The test if more like a filter.  "If you can't even do this right..."
  Reply
#19
Hmmmh, the 5Ds R is eating this one for lunch ...
  Reply
#20
I wonder what the improvements over the version one are? Or is it one of those "Silver ring added for a touch of luuuxury!" updates? Smile

  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)