• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Bought negatives scanner, now I need drivers and software
#1
I just bought Canon canoscam FS4000 US the specs seemed all I needed, however I am having trouble finding software or driver that would run on windows 10, anyone can help

  Reply
#2
toni-a, I had a similar problem in the past, as I own a very old flat scanner - which still perfectly work, given that I only use it for scanning financial documents, so no need for ultra quality - that, at a certain operating system upgrade, was no more detected by the system, clearly because it support by Apple had been dropped. I hate being forced to drop a working piece of hardware just because of missing software.

 

I found that VueScan was able to deal with it, without the need of drivers (because I'm on MacOS; for Windows, VueScan provides its own drivers). Since you can try it freely, I think it's worth while. There's a version for Windows too.

 

Your scanner seems to be supported:

 

https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/canon_fs...nformation

 

Quote: 

If you're using Windows and you've installed a Canon driver, VueScan's built-in drivers won't conflict with this. If you haven't installed a Windows driver for this scanner, VueScan will automatically install a driver.
 

stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
  Reply
#3
Runing a virtual machine of windows xp/7could be a solution.vmware and virtual box are the most popular vitual machines 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLAEgS1oQYQ
  Reply
#4
I have an old laptop with windows XP, it will do the job but I need the software that used to come with it

  Reply
#5
Hi Toni-a,

 

I was able to locate the driver for your your scanner on the Canon website within minutes.

The latest driver is the one for Win-XP 32bit ... which is hopefully what you have.

 

With that driver installed and running you should be able to operate the scanner.

 

Rainer

  Reply
#6
I used to use Vuescan for my Nikon and Epson scanner instead of the original software. Due to lack of time I am not doing film any longer.


I would try this again if I wanted to get back to it.


J.

Quote:toni-a, I had a similar problem in the past, as I own a very old flat scanner - which still perfectly work, given that I only use it for scanning financial documents, so no need for ultra quality - that, at a certain operating system upgrade, was no more detected by the system, clearly because it support by Apple had been dropped. I hate being forced to drop a working piece of hardware just because of missing software.


I found that VueScan was able to deal with it, without the need of drivers (because I'm on MacOS; for Windows, VueScan provides its own drivers). Since you can try it freely, I think it's worth while. There's a version for Windows too.


Your scanner seems to be supported:

<a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/canon_fs4000.html#technical-information">https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/canon_fs4000.html#technical-information</a>
enjoy
  Reply
#7
Quote:Hi Toni-a,

 

I was able to locate the driver for your your scanner on the Canon website within minutes.

The latest driver is the one for Win-XP 32bit ... which is hopefully what you have.

 

With that driver installed and running you should be able to operate the scanner.

 

Rainer
Many thanks rainer, can you provide a link ?
  Reply
#8
Sure ...

 

https://www.canon.de/support/consumer_pr...20(32-bit)

 

and from the intl website ...

 

https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/porta..._downloads

 

... select "win xp" as OS

  Reply
#9
I am scanning my first roll, Vuescan is working very well, I am quite happy with the results however the scanner is extremely slow, in one hour I barely scanned 10 frames, it does batch processing but it is really slow, and since I am not a big fan of scanner sitting...

  Reply
#10
USB 1.1 was slow. And feels even slower nowadays.

  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)