|
|
04-18-2018, 12:21 PM
http://largesense.com/products/8x10-large-format-digital-back-ls911/
75 micron pixel size For comparison - D850: 4.35 microns
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji 
ISO in the millions?
 EDIT: Apparently not. Oh well, my $107K inheritance has not yet arrived.
04-18-2018, 12:45 PM
Actually just 2 iso modes
Base ISO 2,100 - with IR filter - (approximate) High ISO 6,400 - with IR filter - (approximate)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji 
04-18-2018, 12:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2018, 12:53 PM by stoppingdown.)
Well, reading the excerpt in the email my first thought was: ok, at least this camera sees in the dark. But ISO 6400... other cameras do. I suppose this does better, ok, but for 107k?
Anyway, can please somebody explain me what this means: "75 micron pixel size--These are very large and sharp compared to high resolution small format cameras." What actually does mean that a large pixel (that BTW it's rather a large photosite) is "sharp"?
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
04-18-2018, 01:37 PM
I think this camera is really about superior tonality and DR.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
04-18-2018, 01:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2018, 01:42 PM by Brightcolours.)
With a less than great lens, bigger pixels will mask softness of the optics. I guess they mean that. Or that they don't do equivalence, and count themselves rich in the diffraction and noise game.
Or they mean this as "sharp": http://largesense.com/files/cache/254a7e308e896a594e2703620b819e7b_f397.jpg
04-18-2018, 02:11 PM
Did you say... EQUIVALENCE?
(new emoticons aren't good as the old ones)
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
04-18-2018, 03:14 PM
(04-18-2018, 01:40 PM)Brightcolours Wrote: With a less than great lens, bigger pixels will mask softness of the optics. I guess they mean that. Or that they don't do equivalence, and count themselves rich in the diffraction and noise game. AM STONED 
04-18-2018, 04:11 PM
12 MP monochrome.
Meaning: For color pictures you need to filter the light and stack the RGB shots? And: At 8×10 inch printing I'm rather sure to see the 0.075 mm tiles. So after all, the same limits as every Canon G11 or Nikon P7800 have in terms of large printing, horrible diagonals, power-lines as stairs... wow. I take a dozen and get a 144 MP system, swallow that, smombies! Will take ages to set up on a normal Leopard tank, but the tank has it's own IBIS. 
|
