No idea what kind of cameras you have, JJ_SO. Or what kind of lens you mean when talking about stopping down and mirrorless.
I have also no idea why one would want to stop down to f22...
You have a point with lenses that do not have aperture clicks, then things are a tad hard to count.
(04-24-2018, 07:15 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: You can turn the DSLR into live view mode, Klaus. And when shooting with adapted old lenses, I focus wide open, then count the aperture clicks to where I want it to be and take the photo. That would be the same with a lens like this.
Yes, of course, I'm doing so all the time during testing. ;-)
However, that's a rather unnatural workflow on a DSLR - namely, you can't use the viewfinder and it requires pressing one extra button more (live view + mag view rather than just mag view).
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Yes, and the aperture is rather unreliable. I really would like to show you the Laowa I own to get your own impression about "build quality" and usability. How much (or less) they care about details.
Stopping down to f/22 might be necessary for lenses which are rather tough for using focus stacking (and very soon the oh so high optical performance looks much weaker than of an "ordinary" macro lens with AF). In short, my opinion of Laowa is "too expensive for what they are and overhyped". Yes, they offer exotic lenses. But a macro lens with three click positions to shift: up - none - down falls pretty short compared to a PC lens from Canon or Nikon. Meaning: A feature with little benefit.
JJ, I can understand that you are "pissed off". I was also pissed off by Sigma for years.
The thing is - they have improved quite a bit. The blue ring lenses are not comparable to their first attempts.
That doesn't help you, of course.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji