[thxbb12]

7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)

[toni-a]

;-)

Ok, Ok

#1 Nikkor AF-S 24-120/4
#2 Nikkor AF-S 24-70/2.8
#3 Nikkor AF-S 50/1.8
#4 Canon EF 24-70/2.8 II
#5 Nikkor AF-S 85/1.8
#6 Canon FE 24-105/4 IS
#7 Sigma 17-50/2.8
#8 Fujinon 18-55/2.8-4
#9 Nikkor AF-S 16-35/4
#10 Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC

Honorable mention:
#11 Samyang 14/2.8 (MF)

Some surprising items there I'd say.

Quite logic, standard zooms leading what is surprising a little bit is Nikon lead

[Klaus]

7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)

#11 is the most surprising.

* best RF lens review: 24-105/4 L IS at 130.000
* best MFT: Olympus 12-40/2.8 at 500.000 (Panasonic 20/1.7: 490.000)
* best Sony FE: Sony 70-200/4 at 290.000
* best Sony E: Sony 16-50/3.5-5.6 at 500.000
* best Canon EF-M: Canon 22/2 at 160.000
* best Laowa: 12/2.8 at 140.000
* best Tokina: 11-16/2.8 at 430.000
* best Sigma: 17-50/2.8 at 810.000
* best Tamron: 24-70/2.8 VC at 760.000
* best Canon EF: 24-70/2.8 II at 840.000
* best Canon EF-S: 15-85/3.5-5.6 at 740.000
* best Nikkor AF-S: 24-120/4 at 1.004.000
* best Nikkor DX: 16-85/3.5-5.6 at 560.000
* best Nikkor 1: 10/2.8 at 220.000
* best Pentax K: 18-135 at 310.000
* best Pentax Q: 8.5/1.8 at 110.000
* best Samsung: 30/2 at 220.000
* best Samyang: 14/2.8 at 750.000
* best Leica: 25/1.4 (MFT) at 460.000
* best Zeiss: 24-70/4 (FE) at 430.000

[Rover]

7 standard zooms out of 10... guess it's pretty unsurprising. The two primes are also very popular. The only really surprising item is the Nikon 16-35/4, but I guess since it was the originator of a whole class of lenses it may be explained.

Actually Samyang 14mm MF was a hugely popular lens so it's not surprising that it is somewhere near the top of the list - more surprising is that it did not make it into top 10. Even a few pros I know (including the local Reuters and AP photogs) have been using these things, though they are MF only.

[Klaus]

I, for one, am a little surprised about the relatively moderate Sony FE numbers to be honest.
However, some readers have described us as "Sony haters' ... which is, of course, far from the truth.

[thxbb12]

7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)

#11 is the most surprising.

* best RF lens review: 24-105/4 L IS at 130.000
* best MFT: Olympus 12-40/2.8 at 500.000 (Panasonic 20/1.7: 490.000)
* best Sony FE: Sony 70-200/4 at 290.000
* best Sony E: Sony 16-50/3.5-5.6 at 500.000
* best Canon EF-M: Canon 22/2 at 160.000
* best Laowa: 12/2.8 at 140.000
* best Tokina: 11-16/2.8 at 430.000
* best Sigma: 17-50/2.8 at 810.000
* best Tamron: 24-70/2.8 VC at 760.000
* best Canon EF: 24-70/2.8 II at 840.000
* best Canon EF-S: 15-85/3.5-5.6 at 740.000
* best Nikkor AF-S: 24-120/4 at 1.004.000
* best Nikkor DX: 16-85/3.5-5.6 at 560.000
* best Nikkor 1: 10/2.8 at 220.000
* best Pentax K: 18-135 at 310.000
* best Pentax Q: 8.5/1.8 at 110.000
* best Samsung: 30/2 at 220.000
* best Samyang: 14/2.8 at 750.000
* best Leica: 25/1.4 (MFT) at 460.000
* best Zeiss: 24-70/4 (FE) at 430.000

What are the best 2 Fujis and their numbers? (the first is the 18-55, but which one is next?)
Thanks.