[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1294844662' post='5451']
.The only problem I have with higher resolutions is the bigger file sizes that come with that.
[/quote]
No problem with the file size. Simply the people doesn't understand that new camera requires new PC
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1294930604' post='5477']
Well, I personally have 12mp because 3mp or 6mp does not have a better AF/metering/low light performance or LiveView etc... So high pixel density comes with the package...
[/quote]
So then you say you don't need it (12mp). Ok... well, if one never prints in bigger print sizes, one indeed would not need that.
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1294949367' post='5478']
No problem with the file size. Simply the people doesn't understand that new camera requires new PC
[/quote]
That is of course nonsense.
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1294909649' post='5468']
That and amplified corner problems.
[/quote]
There corners are not going to look worse... maybe not much better, but in fact, still better...
[quote name='BG_Home' timestamp='1294955609' post='5482']
There corners are not going to look worse... maybe not much better, but in fact, still better...
[/quote]
That is true... they will not get worse just by increasing the sample rate.
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1294950346' post='5480']
That is of course nonsense.
[/quote]
Tell me why?
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1294949636' post='5479']
So then you say you don't need it (12mp). Ok... well, if one never prints in bigger print sizes, one indeed would not need that.
[/quote]
This is not a "need" and also not a 1 or 0 issue... This is something I pay for and it's good to have 12mp rather than 6mp of course (given that I use a 22inch display). But I don't buy a camera body only for it's sensor's pixel density. It's a priority issue, is that too hard to understand! Actually, we're getting away from the topic here. I still don't understand how come a 24mp in APS-C compared to 16mp in APS-C is a great leap and a must have (when already a lot of other technical criterias deserve an effort)?
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1294995380' post='5490']
Tell me why?
[/quote]
Can't you comprehend yourself why that is nonsense?
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1294960448' post='5485']
That is true... they will not get worse just by increasing the sample rate.
[/quote]
At some stage (effective) blur (and decentering) gets just amplified in terms of pixel spread (not according to the same print size).
If I've a blur spread of 2px @ 12mp it gets multiplied to some degree. Where's the point ? Digicams have long departed from a point where an image is really pixel sharp.
genotypewriter
Unregistered
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1295009704' post='5494']
At some stage (effective) blur (and decentering) gets just amplified in terms of pixel spread (not according to the same print size).
If I've a blur spread of 2px @ 12mp it gets multiplied to some degree. Where's the point ? Digicams have long departed from a point where an image is really pixel sharp.
[/quote]
You make it sound so grim, Klaus <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Not all of us are focusing using the center point and shooting flat subjects wide open <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
GTW
