03-02-2011, 03:06 PM
[quote name='Walter Schulz' timestamp='1299073099' post='6439']
Test it and post results. I tried ...
Again: You can't trick the laws of physic.
Ciao, Walter
[/quote]
I don't want to mess with the related holy law of physics, because simply I don't know it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />... I thought you can introduce Mr. Law-of-Physics to me <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />... Really, I don't understand the interdependencies between pushing up exposure in RAW converter and law of physics (especially when it comes to the noise in the image). How can we compare the results of signal amplification (ISO gain) with a RAW converter functionality?
Serkan
Test it and post results. I tried ...
Again: You can't trick the laws of physic.
Ciao, Walter
[/quote]
I don't want to mess with the related holy law of physics, because simply I don't know it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />... I thought you can introduce Mr. Law-of-Physics to me <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />... Really, I don't understand the interdependencies between pushing up exposure in RAW converter and law of physics (especially when it comes to the noise in the image). How can we compare the results of signal amplification (ISO gain) with a RAW converter functionality?
Serkan