Are the MFT results obtained with distortion corrected or uncorrected image data?
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1304263583' post='7991']
Are the MFT results obtained with distortion corrected or uncorrected image data?
[/quote]
From the corrected one. I've checked the uncorrected ones in the center but there was no significant difference.
Thank you very much for the testing this lens!
I found the resolution data pretty confusing although - such a difference to 20mm f1.7!
Could you please comment on the findings of the lenstip.com:
http://www.lenstip.com/273.4-Lens_review-Panasonic_LUMIX_G_14_mm_f_2.5_ASPH._Image_resolution.html
The center results for 14mm f2.5 seem to be not that much worse then for 20mm f1.7
TIA
Dimitri
[quote name='dkov70' timestamp='1304576935' post='8069']
Thank you very much for the testing this lens!
I found the resolution data pretty confusing although - such a difference to 20mm f1.7!
Could you please comment on the findings of the lenstip.com:
[url="http://www.lenstip.com/273.4-Lens_review-Panasonic_LUMIX_G_14_mm_f_2.5_ASPH._Image_resolution.html"]http://www.lenstip.c...resolution.html[/url]
The center results for 14mm f2.5 seem to be not that much worse then for 20mm f1.7
TIA
Dimitri
[/quote]
As mentioned we were surprised as well.
