10-17-2015, 04:41 PM
Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see anywhere claiming that was the real-time capture. If you had 250MP video, exactly what would you do with it in real time? So I think it likely they can post-process it.
Also the processing used in astro use has very different optimisations than for video use, so a direct comparison is difficult. Astro corrections tend to be optimised to produce a single detailed, low noise image. Features generally don't change much over short periods, with the possible exception of Jupiter. Due to its fast rotation speed, rotation effects start to become significant in as little as minutes, and there is software to de-rotate it also!
For video, you are not trying to produce one low noise image. You would be looking for feature trends and stabilising for that. Look at it as a local IS as opposed to a global one.
Also the processing used in astro use has very different optimisations than for video use, so a direct comparison is difficult. Astro corrections tend to be optimised to produce a single detailed, low noise image. Features generally don't change much over short periods, with the possible exception of Jupiter. Due to its fast rotation speed, rotation effects start to become significant in as little as minutes, and there is software to de-rotate it also!
For video, you are not trying to produce one low noise image. You would be looking for feature trends and stabilising for that. Look at it as a local IS as opposed to a global one.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.