[Rover]

Took me a little while more, as lenscore doesn't have such a face comparison tool as DxO.

 



 

Or a bit better to compare:

 



color scheme of the table was simply worst (red) and best (green) and the digram I made because I find it easier to see if the differences are big or just a tiny bit.

 

At the end, the difference between the Sigma and the Nikkor is peanuts, overall. I just don't see paying 60% less for equal performance not as peanuts.

If all the metrics on the chart follow the "more = better" rule, guess I'll have to cry blood tears because I bought the 24/1.4L for a hefty sum. Mind you, that was before the 24/1.4A was even announced, and the lens did come in handy a few times since then, but still... I'm starting to have a case of buyer's remorse.