01-08-2015, 09:30 PM
http://www.nikon-asia.com/en_Asia/produc...features/1
Saw this recently on the flare and the correction. Looks like the flare might only be a problem on overexposed areas, and the correction isn't that great. On the left light it does seem to recover some of the detail behind it but the flare is still obviously there. If I were to have such a lens I wouldn't worry about the lack of software correction.
As for if the lens is worth it, optical quality is only one aspect. As long as that is "good enough" then other factors may be more important.
Saw this recently on the flare and the correction. Looks like the flare might only be a problem on overexposed areas, and the correction isn't that great. On the left light it does seem to recover some of the detail behind it but the flare is still obviously there. If I were to have such a lens I wouldn't worry about the lack of software correction.
As for if the lens is worth it, optical quality is only one aspect. As long as that is "good enough" then other factors may be more important.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.