[Klaus]

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/img/dcw/do...7.jpg.html

 

XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS

XF 56mm f/1.2 R 

 

Neat ... although I will go for the Zeiss 12mm prime at the wide end.

 

[Guest]

Is the 12 suppose to be as good as fuji 14 ? Also do you plan to test the 23 ?

[Brightcolours]

Is the 12 suppose to be as good as fuji 14 ? Also do you plan to test the 23 ?

Better.

http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=ob...est_ob=382

 

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/img/dcw/do...7.jpg.html

 

XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS

XF 56mm f/1.2 R 

 

Neat ... although I will go for the Zeiss 12mm prime at the wide end.

Now that is nice, that 56mm f1.2 is a 84mm f1.8 equivalent. Nice short portrait lens.

[Guest]

Better how ? It certainly has lower resolution:

http://www.lenstip.com/387.4-Lens_review...ution.html

 

Better.

http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=ob...est_ob=382

 

Now that is nice, that 56mm f1.2 is a 84mm f1.8 equivalent. Nice short portrait lens.

[Brightcolours]

Yes, you are right.

[Rover]

10-24 range AND constant F4 AND image stabilization... looks like a rad combination.

[Dietrdeb]

It seems to me that Zeiss just like Canon tends to have a bit more contrast and color saturation, probably due to lens coating.  Although the colors are nice for landscapes, they tend to be off when taking portraits. IMO