05-19-2013, 01:10 PM
My problem is I don't understand where the 1 system fits int he eco system. micro 4/3 is pretty small; though I suppose the 1 system could make longer light weight fast tele lenses (fast here refers to impact on shutter speed not dof) but beyond that i'm not sure the 1 system has anything to offer over micro 4/3; it is expensive; the sensor is pretty small (with all the limitations of a small sensor) and as for camera size people are already suggesting that the smaller micro 4/3 bodies are reaching the point of diminishing returns (usability vs size).
-
So I guess the question I have is does the 1 system have the eco system to optimize its advantage at the tele-end. I see no point in a 32/1.2 other than support the a full system. Given that the 32/1.2 is near the top of the list (from a market perspective - or at least nikon feels it is) then I think the 1 system is the wrong system - you might as well as use 4/3.
-
Anyways I know it is a bit off topic
-
So I guess the question I have is does the 1 system have the eco system to optimize its advantage at the tele-end. I see no point in a 32/1.2 other than support the a full system. Given that the 32/1.2 is near the top of the list (from a market perspective - or at least nikon feels it is) then I think the 1 system is the wrong system - you might as well as use 4/3.
-
Anyways I know it is a bit off topic