• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > any Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA Test & Analysis ？
ayabow
Unregistered
 
#1
04-11-2013, 05:55 AM
any

 

Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA

E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS

E 20mm F2.8 (SEL20F28)

 

Test & Analysis ？

  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,141

Reputation: 49
#2
04-11-2013, 10:01 AM
Zeiss 24 - request for providing one is out there. I will not buy this one though.

Sony 20 - will buy it.

Sony 16-50 - it's here.
  Reply
Metalex
Unregistered
 
#3
04-23-2013, 04:06 PM
Yeah, why review a lens that might make Sony look good?! Wink

  Reply
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,141

Reputation: 49
#4
04-23-2013, 08:58 PM
Quote:Yeah, why review a lens that might make Sony look good?! Wink
 

Why do I have to purchase a lens for 900EUR just to prove a point ?

If you send it over, I will test it. There was no offer so far. It is as simple as that.
  Reply
Metalex
Unregistered
 
#5
04-24-2013, 11:55 AM
Quote:Why do I have to purchase a lens for 900EUR just to prove a point ?

If you send it over, I will test it. There was no offer so far. It is as simple as that.
 

You don't, but on the other hand why did you use the worst possible lens (16/f2.8) to test the NEX-6 vs NEX-7?  A crappy lens will be a crappy lens, whatever sensor you use. 

 

If the NEX-6 can cope with wide-angle lenses (or any lens for that matter) better than the NEX-7 because of better sensor design/implementation, then surely you are only limiting the results when using a lens that is widely known to have poor edge/corner performance at wide apertures.
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)