[mst]

Results closely match Klaus' Canon review, so I reused most of the review text for this one. However, I went for 24-40-70mm (instead of 24-35-50-70mm) to maintain comparability with earlier Nikon FX reviews of 24-70mm lenses.



http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon_ff/789-tamron2470f28fx



-- Markus

[davidmanze]

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1361147682' post='21987']

Results closely match Klaus' Canon review, so I reused most of the review text for this one. However, I went for 24-40-70mm (instead of 24-35-50-70mm) to maintain comparability with earlier Nikon FX reviews of 24-70mm lenses.



http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon_ff/789-tamron2470f28fx



-- Markus

[/quote]



Hi,

It seems to perform well,but I'm surprised that Tamron have not restyled the barrel a bit better,there's too much resemblance to the well known 17-50 2.8/ 28-75 2.8 budget lenses and that makes it look on the cheap side. Tamron are lagging behind Sigma in this department!



Dave's clichés

[Rover]

But their 24-70 is much better optically than Sigma's. This tradeoff would be fine by me. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

[davidmanze]

    Certainly, the weather sealing is also I nice touch. Nice new Photozone format.

 

   Dave's clichés

[bigboki]

Price wise it is rather similar like Nikon 24-120 f4 

Optically it seems better (a lot?).

Both have VR.

 

Which one to choose for usage on D600?

Thank you in advance!

 

Yours Bojan